Nipple sparing mastectomy, a technique that preserves the nipple and surrounding tissues, is an effective technique for breast reconstruction. According to a study by plastic surgeons at Georgetown University Hospital, there’s no evidence that the procedure increases risk of cancer recurrence.

In nipple-sparing mastectomy, the nipple and surrounding tissues are preserved for use in breast reconstruction, which is generally performed immediately after mastectomy.

From 1989 to 2010, plastic surgeon Scott Spear, MD and colleagues at Georgetown report their hospital’s experience with nipple-sparing mastectomy. They performed 162 nipple-sparing mastectomies in 101 women.

Thirty percent of the operations were performed for treatment of diagnosed breast cancer, while the remaining 70 percent of nipple-sparing mastectomies were performed on women at high risk of breast cancer undergoing preventive mastectomy.

Potential Benefits of the Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Nipple-sparing mastectomy could offer important benefits for patient satisfaction and body image, as well as fewer procedures and complications. Plastic surgeons have been slow to adopt the technique because of perceived safety risks, especially the concern that the preserved breast tissue might contain cancerous cells. To address these concerns, Dr. Spear and colleagues sought to provide objective data on the risks and outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy.

They say that a biopsy is the key to detecting cancer cells. Before breast reconstruction, the doctors analyzed a sample of the tissue from under the nipple. In ten percent of the biopsies of the patients undergoing preventive mastectomy, evidence of breast cancer cells was detected. In these cases, the nipple was not used in breast reconstruction.

In other patients, biopsies detected no evidence of cancer, and the tissues were used for breast reconstruction. At an average follow-up of more than three years, there were no recurrent cancers of the nipple-areola complex in women undergoing therapeutic mastectomy, and no primary cancers in women undergoing preventive mastectomy.

According to the authors, these findings support the previous findings that the long-term risk of cancer developing in the nipple and surrounding tissues after nipple-sparing mastectomy is “zero or near-zero.”

Video: Who’s a Good Candidate for Nipple Sparing Mastectomy?

Surgical oncologist Dr. Richard Gray explains the nipple-sparing mastectomy procedure and which patients may be candidates for this procedure.

Read more

Posted in breast reconstruction | Tagged | Comments Off

An article on HealthDay News last week has illuminated some controversial issues regarding pharmaceutical companies and the increasing number of “lifestyle” drugs being brought to market.

So-called lifestyle drugs are not intended to be cures or traditional treatments. They are marketed as enhancements to address normal conditions like “inadequate eyelashes” or gray hair.

The HealthDay article names several popular medications:

Propecia (finasteride), which began as a stronger-dose drug to treat enlarged prostates, has been prescribed to treat men with male pattern hair loss since 1997; Botox — botulinum toxin — first used to calm spastic eye muscles, was approved to treat frown lines in 2002; and Latisse, initially used to treat glaucoma in the 1990s, became available in 2009 for cosmetic purposes after patients noticed they were also growing longer, thicker eyelashes.

Those who work in health policy are voicing concerns about whether these types of drugs are a poor use of resources or if they promote an unnecessary medicalization of normal, age-related conditions.

For an individual, there’s little or no ethical dilemma regarding the use of medications that enhance appearance or delay the signs of aging. It’s a personal choice.

For a society however, an argument could be made that widespread medicalization of trivial body concerns may lead to mis-prioritization of society’s healthcare resources.

“People can do probably whatever they want, explains health policy professor Dr. Joel Lexchin, “but on a collective level, we have to think about whether producing drugs that enhance people is really the best use of our resources.”

The Food and Drug Administration treats all medications in “an identical manner,” whether they are designed for preventing heart failure or treating wrinkles. What the pharmaceutical companies end up producing depends on the market and the public’s demand for lifestyle drugs.

Read more on the HealthDay article by Maureen Salamon on Womenshealth.gov

Posted in In the Media | Tagged | Comments Off

Loose, excess skin is a common problem for contestants of “The Biggest Loser,” because they lose so much weight in a short amount of time. When this happens, they usually turn to a plastic surgeon for body contouring surgery.

Body contouring can address the the loose skin that causes irritation, issues with the fit of clothing, as well as cosmetic concerns.

Olivia Ward is one contestant who lost 129 pounds on the program. She turned to Dr. Jennifer Walden for a tummy tuck and breast lift.

In this KXAN news segment, Dr. Walden talks about the procedures and how they worked to address the problems faced by the contestant.

Dr. Walden says she performed a tummy tuck and breast lift to complete Ward’s transformation, removing the redundant skin and soft tissue. During the tummy tuck, the doctor lifts up the abdominal skin, removes the apron of extra skin and then tightens the stretched abdominal muscles.

To address deflation and loose skin in the breasts, she performed a breast lift. After dramatic weight loss, body contouring is a form of reconstructive surgery, Dr. Walden explains.

Read more about body contouring in Northern Virginia.

Posted in Body Surgery, Breast lift | Tagged , , | Comments Off

For some patients, eyelid surgery can improve both appearance and vision. Tampabay.com shares a story of Mary Lou Lueders, 74, who says she never considered cosmetic surgery. “I just thought I would grow old gracefully,” she said.

eyelid surgery benefitsWhen she found out that eyelid surgery would improve her vision, she decided to have the procedure. After the procedure, she was happy with not only the functional results, but also the changes to her appearance.

If you have droopy upper eyelids that impair your vision, a functional blepharoplasty procedure may be able to improve your vision. As an additional benefit, you’ll look younger and more rested.

“People told me I looked 10, 20 years younger,” said Lueders after the operation. “Now I understand why women do this sort of thing. It makes them feel better and look better.”

“The face communicates so much,” said Tampa surgeon Adam Scheiner, who performed Lueders’ surgery. “The natural course of aging may make us look sleepy, tired or sick all the time. That’s not fair to those people who feel great but their face sends a different message.”

In Lueders’ case, her eyelid procedure was considered medically necessary and was covered by Medicare. She also had a laser procedure to remove festoons under her eyes, which was considered a cosmetic procedure.

For a total upper face rejuvenation, eyelid surgery can be combined with a brow lift or performed in addition to skin resurfacing around the eyes with a laser resurfacing treatment.

Read more about blepharoplasty in Virginia.

Posted in Facial Surgery | Tagged | Comments Off

After outpatient surgery with anesthesia, older patients are better behind the wheel than younger patients, according to a new study released by the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

The study of 198 patients tested driving ability with a simulator, before and after outpatient surgery under sedation. Researchers checked for driving violations, swerving and other indicators of hindered driving ability.

Weaving and swerving were similar between the two groups, suggesting that the effects of anesthesia had worn off by the time patients were discharged.

The authors also checked how each group, younger and older, managed post-operative pain, and if that affected their driving ability. “We found the amount of pain did not play much importance in the final analysis, but the speed driven did,” said Dr. Asokumar Buvanendran, the lead investigator. “Older patients drove slower and had corresponding better weaving scores because they were able to correct deviations more quickly” he adds.

The researchers suggest that older patients could be more aware of the effects of anesthesia, so they drive more cautiously after outpatient surgery.

According to Buvanendran, as more people undergo ambulatory surgical procedures with short-acting anesthetics, patients are likely to drive before the typical 24-hour waiting period ends. That’s why they decided to perform this research.

Their study was presented at the ASA’s Anesthesiology 2011 meeting in Chicago. The findings have not yet been published in a peer reviewed journal.

Posted in In the Media | Tagged , | Comments Off

A woman in Russia may have been saved by her large silicone breast implants, according to a recent ABC News blog post.

During a dispute, the woman was reportedly stabbed by her husband, but the weapon became lodged within her implant. She had undergone a breast augmentation just five years prior to the attack.

The Russian source of the story (Pravda.ru) reports:

“During the fight, the man stabbed his wife in the left breast. He was apparently trying to kill her since he was targeting the heart. However, the knife did not even reach the thorax because of the large breast implant.”

Silicone implants are known for their cohesive properties. Unlike saline breast implants, they do not immediately deflate, but maintain their shape if a rupture occurs. The implant “did not leak” but “preserved its original shape” Russian news reports said.

ABC spoke with NYU plastic surgeon Dr. Mihye Choi about the story. “It might have been leaking inside the capsule, but you don’t want to ignore leaking even if it is inside the capsule,” he said.

After receiving medical care for the stabbing, the victim returned to her plastic surgery clinic to have the implant replaced.

Posted in Breast Augmentation | Tagged | Comments Off

Trump Taj Mahal casino recently announced a promotion that includes a cosmetic surgery prize worth $25,000, the Associated Press reports.

The winner will mix and match the cosmetic procedures of their choice until they reach the total prize amount of 25,000 dollars. Whoever lands this jackpot might choose to undergo cosmetic procedures like breast enhancement, tummy tuck, facelift or eyelid lift.

Kathleen McSweeney of Trump Entertainment told the Associated Press: “Many people have something they want to change; a nip and tuck here, a lift there, but the cost of these procedures can be quite costly; this promotion will allow the winner the opportunity to get the procedures of their choice.”

This casino promotion joins the growing list of recent contests that raise ethical questions about patient selection. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons has stated in its code of ethics that their members cannot participate in any contest in which the prize is a surgical procedure (requiring an incision).

The winner can, however, choose the cash prize of $25,000 and skip any cosmetic procedures.

Anyone attempting to win this contest (or a contest like it) should ask questions like:

  • Who is performing the surgery?
  • Is that person board certified in plastic surgery?
  • Where is the surgery being performed?
  • Do I need to spend the full prize amount on cosmetic procedures? Is there a part cash/part surgery option?

Do you know the answers to these questions? Please leave a comment and tell us.

Posted in In the Media | Comments Off

Americans had more than 220,000 bariatric surgery procedures last year. According to a new study to be presented at ASPS this weekend, 75 percent of them aren’t aware of their cosmetic surgery options.

after weight loss body contouringPlastic surgeons know that people who experience massive weight loss are typically left with a large amount of loose skin, which leads to problems.

“Many massive weight loss patients suffer large amounts of loose, sagging skin as a result of their rapid weight loss that, if not removed, can cause rashes, wounds, infection, and limit comfortable mobility,” says Jason Spector M.D., lead study author.

Only 25 % Discussed Body Contouring After Weight Loss

Dr. Spector studied 284 patients who had bariatric sugery. He found that only 25 percent had discussed body contouring procedures before or after the operation. Only 14 percent were actually referred to a plastic surgeon for consultation about body contouring. If they had known about their options, almost 40 percent of the patients may have undergone a procedure, the study says.

This lack of awareness can be attributed to “insufficient counseling at the time of bariatric surgery” according to the authors.

Even when they are aware of plastic surgery options, insurance coverage frequently becomes an issue. Even though bariatric surgery such as the Lap Band can be covered by health insurance, post bariatric body contouring will not; it’s still considered elective and cosmetic – despite the fact that it helps to address rashes, infection and significant discomfort caused by loose folds of skin.

The study, titled, “Body Contouring Following Bariatric Surgery: How Much is Being Done,” is scheduled to be presented tomorrow in Denver at 2:45 p.m., during Plastic Surgery 11 THE Meeting.

Read more about body contouring after weight loss in Northern Virginia.

Posted in Body Surgery | Tagged | Comments Off

Last week, USA TODAY ran a front-page story and series of articles that explored controversy about surgical complications and even deaths occurring among people who had cosmetic surgery at “low cost, high volume cosmetic surgery clinics.”

A quote from the article in USA TODAY:

“While these clinics typically employ plastic surgeons who are either board-certified or up for certification, lawyers, victims and other plastic surgeons say these new-style surgery clinics are under so much sales pressure they often don’t sufficiently screen patients for medical problems, do inadequate follow-up and persuade patients to undergo procedures that are either unnecessary or unlikely to get good results. “

Are you putting yourself at risk if you choose one of these high volume, low cost cosmetic surgery clinics? We asked several respected plastic surgeons to respond to this question:

Detroit plastic surgeon Dr. Ellen Janetzke writes:

I definitely agree that people put themselves at risk at the high volume plastic surgery centers. The patient has no idea who their doctor is and what their credentials truly are. There is very little of the traditional doctor-patient relationship, which I feel is SO vital especially in the plastic surgery field.

Washington DC plastic surgeon Dr. Chris Hess of Fairfax, Virginia also commented:

I think people who really want a procedure but have limited money will find someone to do their surgery. They will overlook the negatives and only focus on the fact that what they want will be done. I think these “high volume” centers are dangerous and prey on this kind of patient.

Dr. Bruce Genter, a plastic surgeon in Philadelphia responded as well:

Safety is the primary concern with all surgery, especially cosmetic surgery which is not medically necessary. Likewise, the doctor-patient relationship is the foundation of our health care system. Patients should be wary of clinics where patient evaluations beyond basic intake and screening information are performed by non- physicians and the patients are unable to consult with the physician who will perform the surgery prior to making a financial commitment. It is unacceptable to not meet your surgeon prior to the day of surgery for an elective, cosmetic operation. How can a patient expect to get quality treatment without an evaluation by the person providing the treatment? Patients should worry if paying money seems to be more of a priority than providing information.

Long Island plastic surgeon Tracy Pfeifer argues that physicians practicing in these centers are violating the medical principle to do no harm:

The key factor is that in these cases, medicine is becoming a commodity. The underlying problem is that the patients are choosing their plastic surgery based on cost alone. The physicians who work for these companies, in my opinion, are in violation of the Hippocratic Oath they took when they became physicians. Often the patient is not treated as a human being but rather as a source of income. It is disgraceful.

Dr. Richard Rand, a Seattle plastic surgeon, says he has seen the consequences of these clinics near his office in Bellevue, Washington.

To assume that you can get the same quality of result, safety, and personalized care from a surgeon at a discount “surgical factory” is naive at best and denies a basic understanding that no two surgeons are equal in talent, training, artistry, ethics, and commitment to care. I have seen many unfixable disasters from such places in my area and have also been aware of a death at a laser liposuction clinic directly across the street from my fully accredited surgery center. The law should step in and shut these places down but it does not. Consequently, even though the discounted prices may be tempting, patients choosing these facilities literally risk their health and maybe even their lives. This is clearly not intelligent and I sincerely hope the message is getting out exposing this growing danger.

Indiana plastic surgeon Dr. David Robinson agreed that corners will be cut at high volume clinics.

I do believe that high volume cosmetic surgery centers do come with increased risk. Their goal of high volume at reduced prices is a recipe for disaster. In order to keep prices low, they often have to cut corners. This can include employing less qualified staff such as non-board certified physicans, some of which are not even surgeons. Many of these individuals also have limited training in cosmetic surgery, often taking weekend courses or receiving training from non-accredited organizations. The facilities may also not be accredited which means they are not held to the rigorous standards put in place by states and the federal government.

Posted in In the Media | Tagged , | Comments Off

Medicis, the pharmaceutical company behind Restylane, Perlane and Dysport, recently announced FDA approval for Liposonix.

Liposonix is a new treatment that uses high-intensity, focused ultrasound to eliminate fat that is just beneath the skin. The company reportedly received FDA approval for “non-invasive waist circumference reduction.”

Medicis doesn’t plan to launch the treatment in the United States. In a press release issued this morning, the company stated:

“Medicis is not planning to launch the LIPOSONIX system in the U.S., and would anticipate that plans for a U.S. launch will be announced by an acquiring company, if any, if and when such acquiring company deems appropriate.”

The treatment is available in Canada, Japan and Europe. Although the procedure is officially cleared for sale in the U.S., people interested in it may need to wait until another company acquires the rights to market Liposonix technology from Medicis.

Medicis is best known for providing high quality injectable products, including Restylane and Perlane, some of the world’s most popular wrinkle fillers; and Dysport, the injectable botulinum toxin medication that works in a similar manner to Botox Cosmetic.

Posted in Dysport, Restylane | Tagged , | Comments Off